AAR: Bot vs. Bot vs. Bot

Zero players Churchill game, pictorial AAR

Today I decided to learn how to play new Mr. Herman’s design Churchill. I had no opponents at place, and also didn’t want to play vs. bots myself. So it was decided to conduct showmatch where bots rumble each other at the conference table.

IMG_0551

It’s all started im Moscow in October 1944.

IMG_0553

The US, US and USSR brought the following staffs:

IMG_0555 IMG_0554 IMG_0556

Nikolay Kuznetsov took the chair and began conversation with Global Issues:

IMG_0557

The rest of the issues were as follow:

IMG_0558

Frances Perkins tried to persuade us that US need to conserve production:

IMG_0560

 

Semyon Timoshenko argued with Perkins, as US land lease was still badly needed for the Eastern Front.

IMG_0561

Everyone tried to pull the blanket over himself, so Sir Stafford Cripps also tried to conserve domestic production:

IMG_0562

USSR passed after debating on US production, so Edgar Hoover took the floor about the future of the liberated countries:

IMG_0563

Anthony Eden had own interest in that problem:

IMG_0564

Anastas Mikoyan insisted, that US should put more efforts on the fronts:

IMG_0565

Claude Wickard objected, that those efforts could be made only of US production will require internal demands:

IMG_0566

Andrey Zhdanov counter-argued that thesis and remembered lost Arctic convoys:

IMG_0567

While that happened, Sir Gordon Macready arose unresolved Global issues:

IMG_0569

Though Kaganovich had his own vision of the postwar world. How could Minister of Transportation know it?

IMG_0570

George Marshall, US Army Chief of Staff gave some advice, how British offensive should be conducted:

IMG_0571

Sir Alan Brooke objected, so the question was still unresolved.

IMG_0572

Alexander Novikov stopped their arguing by proposition of usage Royal Air Force in more aggressive style.

IMG_0573

Ernest King and Lord Mountbatten inserted a couple of words on post-world problems, but Molotov remembered Churchill’s promises and closed the question:

IMG_0574 IMG_0575 IMG_0576

 

Frank Knox tried to save production from Russians, no one objected.

IMG_0577

 

Ernest Bevin was sure about UK vision of politics in the post-war world.

IMG_0578

 

Conference would end in a tie, but Stalin breaks it with his last word.

IMG_0580

 

Production for the war efforts was completed:

IMG_0584

And of all fronts only Eastern and SW Pacific went on:

IMG_0585

That’s how Yalta conference started:

IMG_0586

 

And the new delegations were formed:

IMG_0588 IMG_0589 IMG_0590

Agenda won by USSR again:

IMG_0591

This time A-Bomb problem was arised with Global, production, offensive, political and strategic material issues:

IMG_0593

At the end of the conference, Stalin won atomic question, Roosevelt conserved US war efforts and gained some political options which allowed him to win the conference, Churchill won Global issues and UK war efforts:

IMG_0614

 

This time Western and CBI front successfully advanced, as Imperial Japanese Navy sank some US carriers in the Central Pacific:

IMG_0617

 

And the last, Potsdam conference:

IMG_0618

The staffs arrived as follow:

IMG_0620 IMG_0622 IMG_0621

This time Western Allies fought for the chair and after that meeting agenda was determined:

IMG_0625UK won the conference with a lot of Political opportunities:

IMG_0641

Once again, only Western and CBI fronts advanced:

IMG_0644

Score were 32 Soviet (must be 3 more, as I accidentally moved Eastern Front one space right), 43 UK, 29 US. After condition 3 was applied, Churchill won with 38 VP.

IMG_0645

I described in detail only the first conference, but as you can see, it’s very easy to create AAR for this game, as it’s creates unique narrative historical sense. It was very fun to observe bots playing each other and it seemed like a real documentary. Can’t wait to play it with my mates.

Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *